Archive for the ‘2010 Cleantech trends’ Category

The next “plastics” in Cleantech 2010?

Monday, January 4th, 2010

In the 1967 movie The Graduate, 21 year old Ben Braddock (aka Dustin Hoffman) received a famous bit of advice – “there is a great future in plastics.”  The line has lived on since, like an insider stock trading joke – however, VC’s would call the character who delivered this line “a master of the obvious.”  If plastics would be a big market, how would Hoffman have chosen the application area or the start up company that would win?

So over roughly the last seven years, new market categories within Cleantech have come into vogue with similar, layman speak descriptions – insert your favorite – “there is a great future in….” batteries – biofuels – carbon software – demand response – green building materials – LED’s – smart grid – solar PV – wind, and even water.

What’s stunning is how many of these now visible companies only received their Series A funding in the last few years.  Companies like Hara (Series A in 5/2009), Silver Spring (Series A in 4/2008), Solyndra (Series A in 4/2007), Solar Power Partners (Series A in 9/2007) and SunRun (Series A in 6/2008) are all perceived leaders in big market categories, yet they’ve only been in existence for a few years.

Which makes it that much more fun to speculate on the next favorite hot markets.   My votes for three new Cleantech categories which will become more visible (ie. early stage funded) in 2010 are:  1.  nuclear power, 2.  magnetics and 3.  waste heat recapture systems.

Nuclear power, because it makes so much sense.  In a market where there has been so little new R&D, one can only imagine what could be developed if entrepreneurs were given capital and support.  The fun thing about this one is how real green advocates have a conundrum with the benefits and risks.  A relevant company would be NuScale, but there are others as well.

Magnetics, because with so many spinning parts in both existing and newer energy systems the math favors reducing friction (ie. operating more efficiently) and lower lifetime maintenance costs.  A relevant company might be Synchrony which recently introduced a computer controlled bearing.

And Waste Heat Recovery, because energy efficiency is in vogue and waste heat is becoming a more known, literally, as a waste of energy.  Also we can expect, like cogen and fuel cells, these systems will be supported even more heavily with utility incentives going forward.

Oh, and if you want to follow the professionals who write on this stuff look at GreentechMedia with their top 2009 investment listOr Jeffries Investment bank who speculates how much more $ will flow into Cleantech.

2010 Trends in Enterprise Cleantech Finance and Incentives

Monday, December 28th, 2009

During our 2010 business planning we’ve been speculating on trends that may affect our corporate customers (positively or negatively) in the coming 12 months.   In 2009 Groom Energy delivered projects in 25 states and Puerto Rico.  What’s stunning is how much time we spent confirming the incentives available in these states, through utilities, regional ISO’s and Clean Energy trusts.   2010 promises to introduce even great complexity to this already challenging game – in this regard here are four areas we think are worth watching:

1.  PACE rollout across the US – this emerging energy tech financing program, which started in Berkeley, CA as a residential solar PV financing program, has now grown into a much more powerful concept.  PACE (or Property Assessed Clean Energy) financing has broadened, becoming the poster child for enabling both residential and commercial property owners to invest more easily in renewable and energy efficiency upgrades.   Legislation for PACE like programs has now been “enabled” in 17 states, but the devil will be in the details as to how each rolls out their own version, delivering low cost tax exempt debt to property owners.  Regardless, in a market where commercial lending has ground to a standstill, PACE programs have the chance to catalyze lots of projects, providing significant energy and carbon savings – it remains to be seen how fast these programs can be rolled out in a scalable way.

2.  The continued fragmentation of state level PV incentives - While for the past few years CA, NJ, MA and CT have led the nation with developed PV incentive programs, each state has had their formulas for distributing these incentives, and each has experienced intermittent funding for their programs, both for policy and economic reasons.  2010 will bring another level of complication, as incentive programs in several new states will become available.  In these newer programs, confirming incentive formulas will part of the story – continued funding for these programs is a new risk to assess.  As the economics for PV breaks without heavy state incentives, incentive commitment letters for these “approved” projects will be critical.

3.  Carbon Cap’nTrade – Post Copenhagen it’s pretty clear we won’t see 2010 US Federal policy that has immediate economic consequences for Corporate America.  What we’ll be watching is whether Federal policy institutes a “grandfather” clause which encourages action while the policy debate continues in the Senate and the House.  (This grandfather concept was implemented successfully within the energy efficiency code in the EPAct2005).  So in 2010, it could be that state policy overrides lack of Federal policy and defines carbon pricing with vehicles such as RGGI for pricing, although CA will likely not see their program live until 2012.  Guidance for emitters at below the 25MW power plant level might also be forthcoming…

4.  Utility and Trust sponsored Energy Efficiency rebate programs:  While New England and CA have had consistent energy efficiency programs for a number of years, new states and utilities are rolling out more programs in 2010.  Considering we’re still in the Great Recession, free money supporting fast returning energy efficiency investments is clearly worth studying on a state by state level.

So there you have it – maybe next year we can look back on this post and give ourselves a report card on our predictions :)